A useful first price is not a giant transformation budget. It is the smallest paid test that can prove whether one repetitive workflow is worth automating.
At PERSIK LTD, an Automation Studio pilot starts from £199. The final scope and price are agreed before work begins. Ongoing maintenance starts from £99/month only after the workflow proves useful and repeatable.
These are PERSIK starting prices, not a claim about the whole UK market.
A staff member repeatedly takes the same information from an inbox or form, checks agreed fields, updates another system and prepares a notification. A bounded pilot can test that single route first. If the inputs are stable and exceptions can be handed to a person, the workflow may be a good candidate. If the rules change every time, automation may not be the right answer yet.
Only after the workflow is proven and the business wants PERSIK to keep operating, monitoring or maintaining it. A recurring fee should support an already useful process rather than rescue an unproven one.
Scope approval, client credential provisioning and material business decisions remain human checkpoints. PERSIK does not bypass access controls or anti-abuse protections.
Describe the task, how often it happens, the systems involved and the finished result. We can assess whether it is a sensible automation candidate and define the smallest useful pilot.
Show us the manual task